Silver Rises Over 120% YTD  Invest Now  arrow small top right

close

Seigniorage: The Hidden Tax on Every Dollar You Hold

Key Takeaways

  • Seigniorage is the government’s profit from issuing currency — an inflation tax on every dollar you hold. A $100 bill costs roughly 11.3 cents to print [Federal Reserve, 2025 Currency Budget]; the government captures the rest.
  • Under the classical gold standard from 1880 to 1914, average annual inflation was 0.1% [EconLib, Gold Standard]. After 1971, with no gold constraint, the dollar lost roughly 87% of its purchasing power [Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPI-U].
  • The Federal Reserve accumulated a $236–$243 billion “deferred asset” between 2022 and late 2025 — losses booked off the official debt ledger [Congressional Research Service, January 2026]. The Fed returned to modest profitability in late 2025, but with ~$243 billion still to repay, normal-scale Treasury remittances are not projected until around 2030 [Congressional Budget Office].
  • Rome debased the silver denarius from ~98% purity under Augustus to roughly 2–5% by the 270s AD [NGC Ancients]. The severe inflation that followed contributed to the empire’s economic unraveling.
  • Physical gold holds zero seigniorage. No government or central bank can print it, debase it, or dilute the ounce you own.

There’s a tax you’ve been paying your entire life. It’s never appeared on a bill. It doesn’t show up on your pay stub. And the people who collect it wrote the rules that make it legal.

It’s called seigniorage — the profit a government earns by issuing currency worth more than it costs to produce.

What Is Seigniorage?

Seigniorage is the difference between the face value of currency and its cost of production. According to the Federal Reserve’s 2025 currency budget, a $100 bill costs the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing roughly 11.3 cents to print [Federal Reserve, 2025]. The government spends a dime and acquires $100 in purchasing power. That $99.89 gap is seigniorage — profit extracted from the economy through money creation.

The word comes from the Old French seigneur — the feudal lord who held exclusive authority over coinage. His right wasn’t just to mint coins. It was to profit from minting them. The name has outlasted feudalism by seven centuries because the mechanism hasn’t.

The Knowledge That Changes Everything

Your Gold Buying Guide and The Everything Fiat Experiment
2 Free Guides

Two essential guides — yours free. Understand why gold matters and why fiat currencies always fail.

How Does Seigniorage Work in a Modern Fiat System?

Under a gold standard, seigniorage is bounded. Governments can profit from minting coins, but they cannot create money from nothing. The monetary base is tied to the physical supply of gold. Gold grows slowly. No law has ever changed that.

That constraint ended on August 15, 1971, when the United States closed the gold window, ending dollar convertibility to gold and terminating the Bretton Woods system [Federal Reserve History]. As a result, the dollar became a pure fiat currency — backed not by metal but by the government’s promise.

Modern seigniorage doesn’t come from printing presses. Instead, it comes from the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. When the Fed creates money to buy U.S. Treasury securities, it earns interest on those assets. After expenses, net earnings are remitted to the Treasury. At the Fed’s post-COVID peak in early 2022, its balance sheet stood at $8.9 trillion [Federal Reserve, May 2022 Balance Sheet Report].

When money supply grows faster than economic output, each dollar’s purchasing power falls. Everyone holding dollars pays the difference. No legislation required. No vote taken.

Chart C1 — Dollar Purchasing Power vs. Gold Price Index (1971–2026)

Source: BLS CPI-U data; goldsilver.com/price-charts/ | GoldSilver

What Happens When Governments Abuse Seigniorage?

Rome is the case study. Two thousand years ago. Different coins. Same math.

The silver denarius was Rome’s primary coin. Under Augustus (27 BC–14 AD), it was struck at roughly 98% silver purity [NGC Ancients]. It held its value for generations. Then came the costs of empire: military campaigns, administration, and Nero’s rebuilding of Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.

Nero’s solution was to shave the coin. He reduced the denarius’s silver content by approximately 5% — from 98% to 93% — and cut its weight by roughly 12.5% [NGC Ancients]. Holders couldn’t detect the change. The face value was identical. But the treasury had quietly pocketed the difference. That is seigniorage through debasement.

Each successor faced the same fiscal pressures and made the same choice. By the reign of Septimius Severus (193–211 AD), the denarius had fallen to roughly 50% silver [NGC Ancients]. By the 260s, the gold-to-silver coin ratio had gone from 25-to-1 to 1,000-to-1 [The Tontine Coffee-House, citing Roman economic records]. That shift reflects just how thoroughly the silver coinage had collapsed.

By Aurelian’s reign in the 270s, moreover, the coin was down to roughly 5% silver [NGC Ancients]. Within a generation, it would be bronze with a thin silver wash.

Soldiers demanded higher wages to buy the same grain. Merchants refused debased coins at face value. Trade shifted to barter. As a result, the currency that had underpinned centuries of Roman commerce lost its function. The fiscal strategy that financed empire in the short term destroyed the monetary system it depended on.

Modern governments can’t shave coins. However, they can expand money supply through bond purchases, reserve creation, and deficit spending — achieving the same result electronically. The mechanism has modernized. In the end, the math hasn’t changed.

Chart C2 — Roman Denarius Silver Content, 64 AD–270 AD

Source: NGC Ancients; academic numismatic records | GoldSilver

What Is the Federal Reserve’s Deferred Asset?

Since September 2022, the Federal Reserve has been running at a loss.

The cause was a maturity mismatch. Specifically, the Fed’s assets — long-term bonds and mortgage-backed securities bought at near-zero yields — were locked into low fixed rates. Its liabilities weren’t. As rates rose, interest payments to commercial banks on their reserve balances ballooned. In 2024 alone, those payments totaled more than $186 billion [Foundation for Government Accountability, July 2025] — exceeding the income earned on the entire portfolio.

The Fed doesn’t book these losses as losses. Instead, it creates a “deferred asset” — a negative liability on its balance sheet representing the accumulated shortfall. According to the Congressional Research Service, that deferred asset reached approximately $243 billion by the third quarter of 2025 [CRS R48390, January 2026].

Consequently, the Fed returned to modest profitability in late 2025 as rates fell. The Congressional Budget Office projects small remittances of around $8 billion in 2026 [Peterson Foundation, citing CBO]. But with $243 billion in prior losses still to repay, normal-scale remittances to the Treasury are not projected until around 2030 [CBO via CRS].

For three years, the Fed sent nothing to the Treasury. It was covering its own losses. The remittance stream — once a reliable source of tens of billions in annual revenue — went quiet, with the shortfall carried off the official debt ledger.

Meanwhile, the national debt as of June 2026 stands at approximately $39.3 trillion, growing at roughly $6.5 billion per day [U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data, June 2026]. Annual interest costs exceed $1 trillion — more than the entire defense budget [U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data]. Each of those interest dollars has to come from somewhere: taxes, borrowing, or eventually, money creation.

Why Can’t Gold Be Debased?

Gold is not a government promise. No central bank can vote to produce more of it.

Under the classical gold standard from 1880 to 1914, that constraint held average annual inflation to approximately 0.1% [EconLib, Gold Standard]. Small amounts of new gold entered circulation through mining — roughly 1–3% per year. Consequently, prices in 1914 were barely distinguishable from prices in 1880.

Nixon severed that constraint in August 1971. Since then, the dollar has lost approximately 87% of its purchasing power, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U data [BLS CPI-U]. What cost $1 in 1971 costs roughly $8 today. Over the same period, gold moved from $35 per ounce — its official Bretton Woods rate to approximately $4,068 as of June 2026 [goldsilver.com/price-charts/]. Gold didn’t change. The measuring stick did.

Consider the parallel. The denarius started at 98% silver and ended at 2–5%. Likewise, the dollar started at $35 per ounce of gold and now trades at more than 100 times that rate. The asset that held its value through both transitions was not the coin, and it was not the currency. It was the gold itself.

Physical gold holds zero seigniorage. It has no face value — only weight and purity. Therefore, a government cannot debase what it does not issue.

What Does This Mean for You?

Every dollar in your savings account is a Federal Reserve liability — a promise, not a thing. When the money supply expands through seigniorage, that promise is worth a little less. The cost doesn’t arrive as a line item. Instead, it arrives through grocery prices, rent, and healthcare costs outpacing wages. Slow enough to ignore month to month. Total over decades.

Moreover, the saver has no vote on this process. Balance sheet decisions, reserve interest rates, and money creation pace are all set by appointed officials under a congressional mandate. The impact on your savings is invisible until it’s total.

So, what’s the answer? Hold part of your savings in an asset the seigniorage mechanism cannot touch. Choose something with no counterparty and no committee with power over its supply. It should also have a track record of holding purchasing power through every monetary system that has ever tried to outmaneuver it — because it cannot be printed.

Rome’s merchants learned this the hard way. Those who held gold aureus coins while the denarius collapsed preserved their purchasing power through decades of monetary chaos. History doesn’t always repeat exactly. But the mechanism doesn’t change.

Stay On Top of Gold & Silver Prices

Get important market alerts sent straight to your inbox.

People Also Ask

Is seigniorage the same as inflation?

No — seigniorage is the mechanism, inflation is the result. Seigniorage is the revenue a government earns from money creation. Inflation occurs when that money creation outpaces real economic output. In a growing economy, modest seigniorage produces little inflation. However, when governments use seigniorage to cover fiscal deficits — printing money to fund spending — the result is more currency chasing the same quantity of goods, which drives prices up.

How much seigniorage does the U.S. government earn each year?

In a normal year, the Federal Reserve’s earnings remittances to the Treasury — historically $80–$100 billion annually — are the primary source of modern seigniorage.

From September 2022 through late 2025, however, those remittances fell close to zero as the Fed operated at a loss, accumulating a deferred asset of approximately $243 billion [CRS R48390, January 2026]. The Fed returned to marginal profitability in late 2025, and the CBO consequently projects remittances of around $8 billion in 2026 [Peterson Foundation, citing CBO]. Still, the backlog won’t be cleared until around 2030 [CBO via CRS].

Why can’t gold be subjected to seigniorage?

Seigniorage requires a government-controlled gap between a currency’s face value and its production cost. Gold, however, has no government-assigned face value and cannot be created by any monetary authority. Its supply grows only through mining — roughly 1–3% per year globally — and cannot be increased by legislation or policy. As a result, an ounce of gold held privately is a fixed, undilutable claim on real-world resources.

What happened to Rome when it abused seigniorage?

Rome’s silver denarius declined from approximately 98% purity under Augustus to roughly 2–5% silver by the 270s AD, as successive emperors reduced silver content to cover military and administrative costs [NGC Ancients].

The result was severe inflation during the third-century crisis: soldiers demanded higher wages, merchants refused debased coins, and trade shifted to barter. As a consequence, the monetary system that had sustained Roman commerce for centuries broke down as emperors spent faster than the coins could be debased.

How does holding physical gold protect against seigniorage?

Physical gold sits outside the seigniorage system entirely. It is not a government liability or a promise of future payment, and no authority can increase its supply.

Since 1971, the dollar has lost approximately 87% of its purchasing power [BLS CPI-U], while gold has risen from $35 to approximately $4,068 per ounce [goldsilver.com/price-charts/]. Therefore, holding physical gold is not a market prediction. It is a structural hedge against a monetary mechanism that has been operating continuously since August 1971.


SOURCES
1. Federal Reserve — How Much Does It Cost to Produce Currency and Coin? (2025 Currency Budget)
2. Federal Reserve History — Nixon Ends Convertibility of U.S. Dollars to Gold (August 1971)
3. Congressional Research Service — Federal Reserve: Policy Issues in the 119th Congress (January 2026)
4. Peter G. Peterson Foundation — How Do QE and QT Affect the Federal Budget? (citing CBO, 2026)
5. Foundation for Government Accountability — Congress Should End Fed Interest Payments on Bank Reserves (July 2025)
6. NGC Ancients — The Decline of Roman Silver Coinage, Part I
7. EconLib — Gold Standard (0.1% average annual inflation, 1880–1914)
8. U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data — Debt to the Penny (June 2026)
9. GoldSilver — 87% Dollar Devaluation Since 1971: Why Central Banks Keep Buying Gold (BLS CPI-U data)

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.

You May Also like: 

Latest News

Gold coins resting on a financial bar chart, illustrating why strong GDP data affects the gold price
News

Q1 GDP Beat. Jobless Claims Beat. Gold Rose. Here’s Why.

Strong GDP data is actually bad news for gold’s paper price. When the economy grows faster than expected, the Federal Reserve gains permission to raise interest rates — and higher rates increase the cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold. Here’s the mechanism, what June 25’s triple data release confirmed, and what it leaves unchanged for long-term holders.

Read More »

Mary

Samantha is wonderful. I was nervous about spending a chunk of money. I asked her to `hold my hand’ and walk me through making my purchase.  
She laughed and guided me through, step by step. She was so helpful in explaining everything... 

A. Howard

Travis was amazing! I was having difficulty with a wire transfer of my life’s savings, and I was very worried that I might not be able to receive it all. My husband just passed away and I’ve been worried about these funds along with grieving for 8 months. As soon as I got connected with Travis, my concerns were immediately addressed and he put me at ease. The issue was resolved within days. He even called me back with updates to keep me in the loop about what was going on with the funds. I am so grateful for a customer representative like Travis. He really cares for his clients.

Sam was also very helpful! I called and was connected to Sam within 30 seconds. She helped me with a fee that was charged to my account. She had a great attitude and took care of the fee quickly.

talk to us

Get in Touch with GoldSilver Experts

    Michael G.

    Outstanding quality and customer service. I first discovered Mike Maloney through his “Secrets of Money” video series. It was an excellent precious metals education. I was a financial advisor and it really helped me learn more about wealth protection. I used this knowledge to help protect my clients retirements. I purchase my precious metals through goldsilver.com. It is easy, fast and convenient. I also invested my IRA’s and utilize their excellent storage options. Bottom line, Mike and his team have earned my trust. I continue to invest in wealth protection and my own education. I give back and help others see the opportunities to invest in precious metals. Thank you.